Azilis
Advisory
Turning 1,000+ ESG reporting requirements into a clearer digital experience for businesses navigating CSRD and ESRS.
Project Design & Marketing Development Intern · Your Fair Share platform. Public summary only: proprietary screens, internal logic, question content and client information are protected by NDA.
How do you make regulation-heavy reporting feel navigable instead of overwhelming?
Azilis Advisory is a Danish sustainability consultancy and business-development firm. During my Copenhagen internship, I worked on the Reporting stream for Your Fair Share, a digital platform concept intended to help businesses understand and work through sustainability requirements.
The core problem was information overload. European sustainability reporting standards contain dense terminology, interconnected disclosures and more than 1,000 questions to organize. My role was to help translate that complexity into a question-based structure that could feel clearer, more intuitive and more engaging without losing the underlying regulatory logic.
I moved from regulatory research to information architecture, UX concepts and stakeholder iteration.
The work required both analytical depth and communication judgment: understand the regulation well enough to preserve its meaning, then redesign how a user would encounter it so the experience did not feel like a giant compliance checklist.
Research
Reviewed ESRS source material and supporting industry guides, then broke complex disclosures into usable categories and themes.
Structure
Organized 1,000+ questions and mapped logic paths so the information could be experienced as a guided journey rather than a flat list.
Design
Developed three concept wireframes in Miro and Canva, exploring visual hierarchy and light gamification while maintaining the existing brand direction.
Iterate
Presented concepts and video walkthroughs, gathered feedback from an international team, and refined the work through repeated stakeholder review.
The actual wireframes, question database, internal platform logic and client information are intentionally omitted. The photos below show the working environment and collaboration, not confidential product screens.
A 14-week progression from ambiguity to a development-ready concept.
The project was deliberately iterative. I worked independently between team checkpoints, used shared documents to keep work aligned, and adapted the format when schedules changed.
Weeks 1–2
Research, regulatory orientation and vision-board exploration.
Weeks 3–5
Data structuring and early wireframe concepts.
Weeks 6–9
ESRS matching, logic refinement and stakeholder feedback.
Weeks 10–14
Wireframe completion, visual design and final walkthroughs.
The concept work was reviewed by the Azilis team and the wireframe was used as a base for subsequent platform development. Because this was prototype-stage work, I focus on the contribution and design process rather than claiming unmeasured post-launch results.
Clarity is both a product decision and a communication skill.
This project taught me how to enter an unfamiliar technical subject, find the structure inside it, and turn that structure into something another person can understand and use. It strengthened my research, information architecture, visual communication, stakeholder presentation and iteration skills — especially in an international startup where the brief evolved as the work progressed.